"He warned that if candidates were nominated by the public, the population that
earns less than the median monthly salary of US$1,800 could dominate the process."
Hong Kong Leader Warns Poor Would Sway VoteLeung Chun-ying Plays Down Expectations Ahead of Government Meeting With Student Protestershttp://online.wsj.com/articles/hong-kong-leader-sticks-to-election-position-ahead-of-talks-1413817975?mod=trending_now_1 作者: moc 時間: 2014-10-21 17:41
佢快D去返呢個天台跳落去。佢跳落去對社會仲有好處，佢真係「正能量」，正輪樣。 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLXRj604PBI&feature=youtu.be作者: winto 時間: 2014-10-21 17:49
我在radio聽到這言論，即時也覺得689的說法很有問題。作者: man6552000 時間: 2014-10-21 20:07
其實佢都講得好白, 即係話而家嘅政策已經係向富豪傾斜, 而且將來亦都唔想改變呢個傾斜. 作者: CalvinKan2013 時間: 2014-10-21 20:08
What he said is very trur
The main problem is that this should not be from his mouth作者: 醉客 時間: 2014-10-21 20:14
支持"共產主義"再次發揚光大!!作者: Alexng 時間: 2014-10-21 21:17
梁先生忘記了中國政府成立係由什麼人受權的，難道這些人都係有錢人？？作者: CalvinKan2013 時間: 2014-10-21 22:06
本來係人民授權，但一路發展下变左有錢人背後的授權，跟很多現代已發展民主国家一樣作者: LG13680 時間: 2014-10-21 22:45
今晚學生都有講, 但林鄭好似話689唔係咁既意思播.作者: 醉客 時間: 2014-10-21 22:49
月入14,000 是否不需納稅?? 作者: CalvinKan2013 時間: 2014-10-22 03:15
I do not know. Do they really need to pay much tax after all those allowances?
They do have more benefits than others? Like public housing, almost free medical?作者: CalvinKan2013 時間: 2014-10-22 07:22
I think he misunderstood Carl Marx
"Democracy for an insignificant minority, democracy for the rich – that is the democracy of capitalist society. If we look more closely into the machinery of capitalist democracy, we see everywhere, in the “petty” – supposedly petty – details of the suffrage (residential qualifications, exclusion of women, etc.), in the technique of the representative institutions, in the actual obstacles to the right of assembly (public buildings are not for “paupers"!), in the purely capitalist organization of the daily press, etc., etc., – we see restriction after restriction upon democracy. These restrictions, exceptions, exclusions, obstacles for the poor seem slight, especially in the eyes of one who has never known want himself and has never been in close contact with the oppressed classes in their mass life (and nine out of 10, if not 99 out of 100, bourgeois publicists and politicians come under this category); but in their sum total these restrictions exclude and squeeze out the poor from politics, from active participation in democracy.” (Lenin, State and Revolution, Chapter 5) 作者: kytsui 時間: 2014-10-22 08:29
佢是鼓吹黑金政治，以鈔票換選票。作者: schumannsiu 時間: 2014-10-22 08:39
上次嫻姐話可能佢唔夠力 CY 出唔到嘢,原來CY儲埋儲埋一炮過出啲咁嘅嘢。
我熌,熌開左。
各位小心。作者: CalvinKan2013 時間: 2014-10-22 09:27
政治一向是以利益換選票，所有制度都一樣，冇着數穩鬼選你？作者: clothbag_arhat 時間: 2014-10-22 12:22 本帖最後由 clothbag_arhat 於 2014-10-22 12:31 編輯
講Ｄ咁仆街嘅嘢
